Ok...first comment...George W. Bush didn't win "re-election in 2024." It was 2004. Yes, this is a nano-nit, but one worth picking.
Second...There is a paragraph in my version that reads "Let’s be frank: VP Harris was a terrible candidate, who spoke in word salads and couldn’t divorce herself from her progressive record. The majority of American" There is no ending, no completion of this thought. This more nit than nano-nit.
Third..."Mr. Trump has a mandate now...: Personally, i wouldn't have used the word 'mandate' as 2.5 percent is pales in comparison to Reagan's 18 percent in 1984 and Johnson's 23 percent in 1964. Those were mandates. Regardless, there is no doubt who won. Why is a question that will be pondered by future progressive apologists. Doesn't really matter why, though.
OK...all nit-picking aside, I enjoyed your post, and for that I thank you. But remember, we are squarely in the crosshairs now. In two years, if we are not "feeling financial and regulatory relief," were going to be in deep doo-doo. We will be blamed for everything under the sun, and some that isn't. What ever he does, he needs to get it right and get it right the first time! No do-overs. Ms. Harris should be lamenting her "do-over" on fracking.
As a nation, unanimity of views is never an option, but acting together is imperative, and I pray that Mr. Trump can put aside our political strife and focus on making the country a better place to live. He would be wise to build his presidency around energy - it's importance to our economy, it's importance to world security, and it's importance for humanity to thrive.
Do you have an editor of your posts? Someone to do a quick read to make certain the red-faced test is passed? Might be worth considering. Just sayin'
I was rushing to post and accidents happen. I'm very Type A about my grammar and missteps happen. I don't need an editor, but thanks for opining and reading.
America 🇺🇸 is back BUT! This is no time to grow comfortable and complacent. “The price of freedom is eternal VIGILANCE!”
Ok...first comment...George W. Bush didn't win "re-election in 2024." It was 2004. Yes, this is a nano-nit, but one worth picking.
Second...There is a paragraph in my version that reads "Let’s be frank: VP Harris was a terrible candidate, who spoke in word salads and couldn’t divorce herself from her progressive record. The majority of American" There is no ending, no completion of this thought. This more nit than nano-nit.
Third..."Mr. Trump has a mandate now...: Personally, i wouldn't have used the word 'mandate' as 2.5 percent is pales in comparison to Reagan's 18 percent in 1984 and Johnson's 23 percent in 1964. Those were mandates. Regardless, there is no doubt who won. Why is a question that will be pondered by future progressive apologists. Doesn't really matter why, though.
OK...all nit-picking aside, I enjoyed your post, and for that I thank you. But remember, we are squarely in the crosshairs now. In two years, if we are not "feeling financial and regulatory relief," were going to be in deep doo-doo. We will be blamed for everything under the sun, and some that isn't. What ever he does, he needs to get it right and get it right the first time! No do-overs. Ms. Harris should be lamenting her "do-over" on fracking.
As a nation, unanimity of views is never an option, but acting together is imperative, and I pray that Mr. Trump can put aside our political strife and focus on making the country a better place to live. He would be wise to build his presidency around energy - it's importance to our economy, it's importance to world security, and it's importance for humanity to thrive.
Do you have an editor of your posts? Someone to do a quick read to make certain the red-faced test is passed? Might be worth considering. Just sayin'
I was rushing to post and accidents happen. I'm very Type A about my grammar and missteps happen. I don't need an editor, but thanks for opining and reading.