An interesting post, young lady. Thank you. I'm not exactly sure I know what a "chat bot" is, or ChatGPT. I'm from the generation where we didn't have computers to do our work; our high school themes, our college essays, thesis, dissertation, etc. were produced through the biological processes known as "thought and hard effing work."
That said, I also acknowledge that technology is first and foremost about making life easier and allowing humans to reach their full potential. Such improvements inevitably produce ethical dilemmas. It's one thing to alter our appearance. But, what is your opinion on such technology producing scholarly, peer-reviewed papers? Have you, or would you ever, ask ChatGPT or Copilot or whatever to write an essay and publish it under your name?
I recently read a paper published in a journal written by Grok. The authors clearly stated that the paper represented Grok's "true belief at this time", but also acknowledged that the paper had "significant guidance from human co-authors."
Having fun with visual alterations is OK, but there is a serious question underlying our ability to control and manipulate messaging. Your thoughts, ma'am? I'd be obliged! Thank you.
AI is already omnipresent in our lives. Lots of benefits, but it boils down to exerting control over it and not letting it control you. As with everything in life.
I'd never default to AI/ChatGPT to write my articles or policy papers. It would ruin the purpose of my being a journalist/writer. I use transcribing services like Otter.ai to transcribe my interviews to make it easier to grab quotes to use. That's about it.
And I don't want people creating fake AI videos of me and misrepresenting my views, especially done in a malicious ways. I haven't been subjected to this, even with a big digital footprint, but worry some people I know will be subjected to it one day.
We need basic guardrails, and policy-wise, I like what the Trump administration has proposed so far on the AI front.
Thank you, ma'am. You are correct - AI is everywhere, and it will take time to understand both its potential and its limits. My hope for it is that those "guardrails" you referenced are set by the market, not by a government.
An interesting post, young lady. Thank you. I'm not exactly sure I know what a "chat bot" is, or ChatGPT. I'm from the generation where we didn't have computers to do our work; our high school themes, our college essays, thesis, dissertation, etc. were produced through the biological processes known as "thought and hard effing work."
That said, I also acknowledge that technology is first and foremost about making life easier and allowing humans to reach their full potential. Such improvements inevitably produce ethical dilemmas. It's one thing to alter our appearance. But, what is your opinion on such technology producing scholarly, peer-reviewed papers? Have you, or would you ever, ask ChatGPT or Copilot or whatever to write an essay and publish it under your name?
I recently read a paper published in a journal written by Grok. The authors clearly stated that the paper represented Grok's "true belief at this time", but also acknowledged that the paper had "significant guidance from human co-authors."
Having fun with visual alterations is OK, but there is a serious question underlying our ability to control and manipulate messaging. Your thoughts, ma'am? I'd be obliged! Thank you.
AI is already omnipresent in our lives. Lots of benefits, but it boils down to exerting control over it and not letting it control you. As with everything in life.
I'd never default to AI/ChatGPT to write my articles or policy papers. It would ruin the purpose of my being a journalist/writer. I use transcribing services like Otter.ai to transcribe my interviews to make it easier to grab quotes to use. That's about it.
And I don't want people creating fake AI videos of me and misrepresenting my views, especially done in a malicious ways. I haven't been subjected to this, even with a big digital footprint, but worry some people I know will be subjected to it one day.
We need basic guardrails, and policy-wise, I like what the Trump administration has proposed so far on the AI front.
Thank you, ma'am. You are correct - AI is everywhere, and it will take time to understand both its potential and its limits. My hope for it is that those "guardrails" you referenced are set by the market, not by a government.
Please, keep up your good work! Thanks again.