Does the overturning of the Chevron Doctrine have any effect on this? I thought the administrative state was not allowed to make rules without the legislative process?
Yes, with the 2+ lawsuits pending it can be challenged in a post-Chevron doctrine world since Congress - not Bureau of Land Mgmt - crafted and passed FLPMA. So under post-Chevron logic, Congress would/wouldn't change multiple-use management of public lands.
Nicely done, ma'am. Thank you. "dirty clean energy companies" have been getting a pass for years! For every new standard, there is someone, somewhere out there who is willing to pay to get around it.
My pleasure! This rule is so brazen in their quest to divorce the U.S. from a true conservationist ethos by forwarding extreme environmental groups and setting aside large swaths of public land for non-uses. The latter would invite a whole host of problems - invasive species, high-intensity wildfires, etc.
Does the overturning of the Chevron Doctrine have any effect on this? I thought the administrative state was not allowed to make rules without the legislative process?
Yes, with the 2+ lawsuits pending it can be challenged in a post-Chevron doctrine world since Congress - not Bureau of Land Mgmt - crafted and passed FLPMA. So under post-Chevron logic, Congress would/wouldn't change multiple-use management of public lands.
Nicely done, ma'am. Thank you. "dirty clean energy companies" have been getting a pass for years! For every new standard, there is someone, somewhere out there who is willing to pay to get around it.
My pleasure! This rule is so brazen in their quest to divorce the U.S. from a true conservationist ethos by forwarding extreme environmental groups and setting aside large swaths of public land for non-uses. The latter would invite a whole host of problems - invasive species, high-intensity wildfires, etc.
Great sum-up of the issue!
And thank you for the brilliant blog today!